I find test coverage a useful thing to track, but I can't find a good metric.
"Coverage decreased by 10%" sounds bad. If you're deleting pointless code that has tests, it's good!
Perhaps total untested lines of code is better?
miniblog.
Related Posts
Git repositories have the lovely properties that deletes aren't propagated. Shared/cloud storage sync deletes across devices.
Accidentally deleting content in a local git repo, and even pushing it, is a safe operation.
Docker Hub will start deleting images that haven't been pushed or pulled in 6 months: https://www.docker.com/pricing/retentionfaq
I self-host most of my servers, but it's nice having all my images available on an external service.
Deleting more MS-DOS code in remacs. There's a lot of it: the commitment to Emacs portability is impressive!