"Static vs. Dynamic" Is the Wrong Question https://www.craigstuntz.com/posts/2016-06-18-static-vs-dynamic-wrong-question.html (great post, not zealotry. 'Static types' are a suite of distinct tools)
miniblog.
Related Posts
LLMs are great at style transfer, and this works surprisingly well for syntactic transformations too.
I rewrote a small website's EJS templates to 1500 LOC of TSX with a oneshot in Claude. It took ~12 minutes, but it just worked.
(TSX seems nicer than EJS for static analysis.)
Is there a good canonical name for autofixes, where a static analysis tool can apply a change to resolve an issue?
Clang calls them fix-its, LSP calls them quickfixes.
I've been writing docs for different programming language operators (+, *, == and so on). Each one gets a separate web page.
I've suddenly realised that / is much harder! docs/+ and docs/== is fine, but docs// just doesn't work as a URL in a static site.
Any ideas?