miniblog.

← Back to all posts
Feb 28, 2021 at 00:08
1
I'm finding that it's easier to write static analysis tools for language X in language X. It's less to think about. I've been writing an analysis for JS. I really like working with typescript but it's been easier to prototype if I dogfood.

Related Posts

Mar 8, 2026 at 22:56
33
Writing type params with <> (e.g. List<Int>) seems the most natural to me: probably because I encountered that syntax first. Between C++, Java and TypeScript I think it's the most common too. List[Int] seems to be next most common (Scala, Python) but TIL Gleam uses List(Int)!
Dec 4, 2025 at 10:37
71
Delighted to see that Typescript 7 is moving to conventional LSP for its IDE services!
Progress on TypeScript 7 - December 2025 - TypeScript
Progress on TypeScript 7 - December 2025 - TypeScript
Earlier this year, the TypeScript team announced that we’ve been porting the compiler and language service to native code to take advantage of better raw performance, memory usage, and parallelism. This effort (codenamed “Project Corsa”, and soon “TypeScript 7.0”) has been a significant undertaking, but we’ve made big strides in the past few months. We’re […]
Mar 12, 2025 at 04:57
84
It's interesting to see the "why not Rust?" discussions around the TypeScript news that they're using Go. It shows that Rust has reached a level of maturity that it's a default for some users. Go does seem to be in a sweet spot for AOT languages with GC though.