miniblog.

← Back to all posts
Jan 10, 2017 at 22:55
Why implement a language on top of Racket? A great overview of the advantages from the author of Hackett:
Rascal is now Hackett, plus some answers to questions

Related Posts

Jan 23, 2026 at 00:09
1
Futhark's design is deliberately trying to stay simple to keep long term design sustainable. The author also has an interesting discussion of relative versus absolute paths in import syntax, and how relative paths can make local analysis easier.
Designing a Programming Language for the Desert
A high-performance and high-level purely functional data-parallel array programming language that can execute on the GPU and CPU.
Dec 11, 2025 at 23:30
133
I've added an eval button to the website of my programming language! It's a been a lot of work to lock down appropriately. It still needs some UI polish but it's so nice to be able to try snippets immediately.
PhotoPhoto
Garden
Dec 4, 2025 at 10:37
71
Delighted to see that Typescript 7 is moving to conventional LSP for its IDE services!
Progress on TypeScript 7 - December 2025 - TypeScript
Progress on TypeScript 7 - December 2025 - TypeScript
Earlier this year, the TypeScript team announced that we’ve been porting the compiler and language service to native code to take advantage of better raw performance, memory usage, and parallelism. This effort (codenamed “Project Corsa”, and soon “TypeScript 7.0”) has been a significant undertaking, but we’ve made big strides in the past few months. We’re […]