I really like Clojure's let syntax. It works well when you only have a single variable. In other lisps, this feels a little verbose:
(let ((my-var (foo)))
(bar foo))
I've seen a let1 macro used in books, but not in the wild.
miniblog.
Related Posts
I'm looking at adding bitwise AND and OR to my programming language. Do I add & and | operators, methods x.and(y) or a library bitwise::and(x, y)?
My inclination is to add infix operators (concise and familiar) but syntax is such precious real estate.
I've been iterating further on how Garden shows type errors.
For types in the standard library, I'm now showing "a String" but "an Int". I'm also doing basic syntax highlighting of the code excerpt.
What do you think?
It's funny how languages can offer multiple forms of syntax, but formatters standardise to a single form.
E.g. single vs double quotes in JS, optional semicolons in JS, different ways of grouping imports in Rust.
Should new languages be more syntactically opinionated?