miniblog.

Is there a good term for "after using this feature we realised that the best design is different from the current design"? In casual conversation I generally hear "bug" but there was nothing wrong with the original implementation.

I've realised that AGENTS.md / CLAUDE.md solve two distinct problems: * It tells the LLM the conventions of the project, avoiding follow-up prompts. * It precomputes a summary of the project, saving a bunch of searches at the start of a session.

I've been experimenting with different pagination UIs. It's so common to have arrows, but I've realised they're redundant here. When you have the adjacent values as well as the final value, you don't need > and >> arrows too. Thoughts?