miniblog.

I tried OpenClaw today and I was surprised by the short time horizon of conversations. Am I holding it wrong? W: Summarise open issues on my GH repo. O: (summary) W: OK, remember how I want you to format content [..]. O: Noted. W: Summarise the issues again. O: What issues?

Is there a good term for "after using this feature we realised that the best design is different from the current design"? In casual conversation I generally hear "bug" but there was nothing wrong with the original implementation.

Should lint suppressions be first class syntax or comments? Adding a proper metadata system (e.g. Clojure or Rust) is a big design space but it's clear which expressions are affected. Comments are much easier to implement but it's easy for users to get them wrong. Thoughts?