Advice from one of the authors of Common Lisp on PL work: established languages tend to win in their domain. It really helps if you enjoy working in this space.
(There is a ton of PL skill and insight in the smaller languages IME.)
https://pldb.com/posts/scottFalhmanInterview.html
miniblog.
Related Posts
Today I learnt that Racket *intentionally* doesn't have a traditional REPL workflow. The authors were concerned about students not understanding the state between the current session and the code on disk.
(Arguably Jupyter has some of these features now.)
Difftastic has been cited in a paper!
Modernizing SMT-Based Type Error Localization https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.09034
The authors use difftastic to work out which parts of a buggy program have actually changed, a great use case :)
One interesting technique to reduce the review burden in Home Assistant, a project with a large community: ask PR authors to review other PRs!
Screenshot is from


