miniblog.

Should lint suppressions be first class syntax or comments? Adding a proper metadata system (e.g. Clojure or Rust) is a big design space but it's clear which expressions are affected. Comments are much easier to implement but it's easy for users to get them wrong. Thoughts?

When a tool supports both regular expressions and literal strings, which should be the default? If you default to regex, users can match more strings than they realise (e.g. `foo.txt`) or less (e.g. `foo(bar)`). I typically see regex as the default, but I prefer the opposite.

The lisp model of programming is generally: write a function, evaluate it, interactively call it with some arguments, iterate. Jupyter notebooks are similar. Why not automatically evaluate definitions (not expressions) whilst working? It seems like it could be a satisfying way to work with code.