Writing multi-threaded code is remarkably cross-cutting. It's harder to factor out common functionality when you depend on specific locks.
miniblog.
Related Posts
It's so strange that we talk about languages being slow, and have done for years. Computer performance has increased so much in this time.
https://hbfs.wordpress.com/2009/11/10/is-python-slow/ (shared on HN in 2009) discusses Python being slow. My underpowered Thinkpad has 20x the single-threaded performance! https://www.cpubenchmark.net/compare/73vs3766/AMD-Athlon-64-4000+-vs-AMD-Ryzen-5-PRO-4650U
Maybe *relative* performance of languages matters more?
It's so strange that we talk about languages being slow, and have done for years. Computer performance has increased so much in this time.
https://hbfs.wordpress.com/2009/11/10/is-python-slow/ (shared on HN in 2009) discusses Python being slow. My underpowered Thinkpad has 20x the single-threaded perf!
Are users more tolerant of a slow programming language if it has good multithreading or green threads?
I'd be willing to use a PL with good ergonomics that runs at 0.5x speed if it's easy to saturate multiple threads.
(PLs focusing on single-threaded performance are common!)
