Current status: working on crazy go-to-definition tool for elisp: https://github.com/Wilfred/elisp-def
It understands let, let*, global vars, functions and even macros that introduce bindings!*
*Some terms and condition apply.
Related Posts
I'm trying to decide the best voice for PL documentation.
Passive: "`let` can be used with destructuring."
Reader focused: "You can use `let` with destructuring."
Describing the PL: "FooLang supports destructuring with `let`."
Anyone have opinions or best practices?
Go has an elegant approach to defining example functions, which are shown in docs as `main()` with the output: https://go.dev/blog/examples
I really like pattern matching in Rust, but I find myself using it less and less.
`if let` and `let ... else` require substantially less indentation, and I often use them for Option values.
I don't miss this syntactic sugar in OCaml though. Maybe it's just because OCaml has a 2 space indent, unlike Rust's 4 space indent?