miniblog.

I've heard of 'blub languages', where you don't realise that other languages have better abstractions until you've experienced them. I think the same thing happens with individual features. I've seen several C++ folks miss variadic generics in Rust, but I've not written enough C++ to feel it.

Further tinkering with diagnostics, following feedback! * Two lines of context above and below now. * The caret is included in the line below where possible. * Syntax highlighting of keywords. I kinda feel that smart context sizing would be better. What do you think so far?

I've been building an 'extract function' refactor feature. It's surprisingly nuanced. Where do you put the extracted function? Once you've done the static analysis, what order do you use for the parameters?