Building anti-abuse systems in decentralised communication tools: https://dustycloud.org/blog/possible-distributed-anti-abuse/
Related Posts
One interesting consequence of the rise of LLMs: there's more demand for tools that handle untrusted input.
Arbitrary HTML+JS can be safely run in a browser. Lean can check an arbitrary proof.
These work really well with an LLM that can be wrong, but sometimes gives exactly what you want. Are there other tools in this family?
I've been building an 'extract function' refactor feature. It's surprisingly nuanced.
Where do you put the extracted function? Once you've done the static analysis, what order do you use for the parameters?
Today I learnt that Emacs 28 shipped a context-menu-mode! https://oylenshpeegul.gitlab.io/blog/posts/20230129/
This seems quintessentially Emacs: deeply hackable, but building UI features in an order very different to the mainstream.