The only thing I could spot was a lack of named groups and back references.
miniblog.
Related Posts
@aburka Thanks for the feedback!
Definitely agreed on ours vs theirs, it's really confusing. Unfortunately I'm limited to how the sides are named in the file.
I like the diff3 conflictStyle in git, as it shows the base as well as both sides. I can't guarantee that the base is visible though, and it gives me three files to diff rather than two. Not sure about this case yet.
Structs are great in Rust, but sometimes I find them a bit heavyweight. There's a little more syntax than e.g. OCaml, for type definitions and usages.
I end up using more structs (records) in OCaml as a result.
rust-analyzer has "convert tuple to named struct", which helps.
TIL that coreutils has a lightweight version of the `finger` command, appropriately named `pinky`!