The most successful code review tools have a clear path to getting your patch included.
It feels much more collaborative to ask for changes before a patch is accepted. Afterwards, a reviewer can be seen as difficult, even with the same feedback!
Related Posts
Chekhov's repro: If a line of code is included in a bug report, it should contribute to the debugging somewhere.
Further tinkering with diagnostics, following feedback!
* Two lines of context above and below now.
* The caret is included in the line below where possible.
* Syntax highlighting of keywords.
I kinda feel that smart context sizing would be better. What do you think so far?
Are there any package managers that treat changelogs as a first class concept?
I end up looking for a CHANGELOG.md or a CHANGES.txt in the source code repository every time. The lack of standard prevents package hosting services being able to show changes.