TXR Lisp describes its stdlib as "a significant standard library of userful functional combinators". I can't decide if "userful" is a typo or a pun.
https://www.nongnu.org/txr/txr-lisp.html
Related Posts
Is there any relationship between language adoption and the size of its standard library?
These days it seems completely orthogonal, but early Java adopters spoke highly of the collections library compared with C++.
Maybe it's the widespread availability of package managers?
It is remarkably hard to escape command line arguments safely on Windows, and the standard libraries of multiple languages have needed patching: https://flatt.tech/research/posts/batbadbut-you-cant-securely-execute-commands-on-windows/
TIL Tcl has a notion of 'safe interpreters', a mode where you can run untrusted code in a sandbox: https://www.tcl.tk/man/tcl8.4/TclCmd/safe.htm
Not many programming languages have this, but it's way safer to include in the implementation than try to build as a userland library.