Considering abandoning my http://t.co/AoAj7NWsen in favour of init.el. I find org-babel code less hackable, and many tools write to init.el.
Related Posts
`init` feels like an unhelpful name in OO. It doesn't give you an initial value, it initialises the instance that has already been created. Developers are often surprised that init doesn't return the instance, because they have a strong association with `new Foo()`.
Perhaps `finish` would have been a less confusing name?
Over a sufficiently long time horizon, all code you write is legacy code.
I'm intrigued to see that Google has quantified that new code is generally buggier and less secure than code that has existed in your codebase for longer: https://security.googleblog.com/2024/09/eliminating-memory-safety-vulnerabilities-Android.html