Looked at a online community today with discussions going back to before 2001. Not many sites last that long!
miniblog.
Related Posts
I still find C-style format strings to be more readable than Rust format strings.
"Player %s has score %d" vs "Player {} has score {}".
The former feels a little easier to visualise how it will look in practice.
Have I missed anything? Every format string specification I've ever looked at is surprisingly big.
@elbosso Of course you can weigh in! :) I've used reveal.js for several presentations in the past, and I liked it.
The presentations looked great, especially with syntax highlighting.
I did find myself futzing with written HTML more than I wanted though (e.g. wanting an image caption in a specific place). It's also a little harder to share than a hosted service, especially if you want reader comments.
Definitely a great option in many cases still.
@krinkle@mastodon.technology I don't know of anyone using difftastic by default, including me! (I use it >50% of the time though.)
I toyed with background colours but I didn't find anything that I really liked. Contrast is hard, and depends on the user's theme.
Background colours look bad with syntax highlighting (e.g. red background with blue comment text).
It also looked silly due to ignoring whitespace between symbols.
It's an interesting space and I'm still experimenting :)